Mohammed Ahmed Khan Vs Shah Bano / Mohd Ahmed Khan V Shah Bano Begum And Ors Lexauxilium Com : 1985 (1) scale 767 (23 april 1985)

Mohammed Ahmed Khan Vs Shah Bano / Mohd Ahmed Khan V Shah Bano Begum And Ors Lexauxilium Com : 1985 (1) scale 767 (23 april 1985). Khan under section 125 of the criminal procedure code, 1973 (cr.p.c, 1973). Shah bano begum was married to a lawyer named mr. Shah bano begum and ors. They lived together for 43 years and had five children. A lawyer by profession mohammed ahmed khan married shah bano begum in the year 1932 and 5 children were born out of said wedlock.

Ahmed khan respondents shah bano begum and ors date of judgement 23 rd april, 1985 bench hon'ble justice chandrachud, y.v. ((cj) misra rangnath desai, d.a. 1985 (1) scale 767 (23 april 1985) Her husband said he is obligated to pay her a lumpsum of only ₹5400, as per the islamic law. The case highlighted questions with which a.

Shah Bano Begum Vs Mohd Ahmed Khan Youtube
Shah Bano Begum Vs Mohd Ahmed Khan Youtube from i.ytimg.com
Khan under section 125 of the criminal procedure code, 1973 (cr.p.c, 1973). 1985 air 945, 1985 scr (3) 844. Venkataramiah on 23 april 1985. 1985 air 945 1985 scr (3) 844 1985 scc (2) 556 1985 scale (1)767. In april 1978, the wife filed a petition against the husband under section 125 of the criminal procedure code 1973. It is also referred to as the shah bano case. Shah bano begum 1985 (1) scale 767 = 1985 (3) scr 844 = 1985 (2) scc 556 = air 1985 sc 945, commonly referred to as the shah bano case, was a controversial maintenance lawsuit in india, in which the supreme court delivered a judgment favouring maintenance given to an aggrieved divorced muslim woman. (cj), desai, d.a., reddy, o.

This case is a landmark case on gender equality and divorce especially as it refers to indian muslims.

Shah bano begum and ors. They lived together for 43 years and had five children. Also called the shah bano case is seen as one of the milestones in muslim women's fight for rights in india and the battle against the set muslim personal law. (cj), desai, d.a (j), reddy, o. In april 1978, the wife filed a petition against the husband under section 125 of the criminal procedure code 1973. Khan under section 125 of the criminal procedure code, 1973 (cr.p.c, 1973). 1985 air 945, 1985 scr (3) 844. ((cj) misra rangnath desai, d.a. 1985 air 945 1985 scr (3) 844 1985 scc (2) 556 1985 scale (1)767 citator info : Shah bano begum 1985 (1) scale 767 = 1985 (3) scr 844 = 1985 (2) scc 556 = air 1985 sc 945, commonly referred to as the shah bano case, was a controversial. After marrying his second wife, ahmed khan asked shah bano to move to a separate residence. Ahmed khan v shah bano begum | women's rights case law. A lawyer by profession mohammed ahmed khan married shah bano begum in the year 1932 and 5 children were born out of said wedlock.

1985 air 945, 1985 scr (3) 844. They were married for 14 years and had 5 children when ahmed khan married a younger woman. It is also referred to as the shah bano case. 1985 (1) scale 767 (23 april 1985) This case is a landmark case on gender equality and divorce especially as it refers to indian muslims.

The Shah Bano Controversy A Case Study Of Individual Rights Religious Tolerance And The Role Of The Secular State Inquiries Journal
The Shah Bano Controversy A Case Study Of Individual Rights Religious Tolerance And The Role Of The Secular State Inquiries Journal from www.inquiriesjournal.com
((cj) misra rangnath desai, d.a. F 1986 sc 587 (4) rf 1987 sc1103 (10) d 1988 sc 644 (5,6) act: Khan took another wife, legally according to islamic law, with whom he produced additional children. As per muslim personal law, he paid rupees 3000 to his divorced wife. In 1975, when shah bano's age was 62 years, she was disowned by her spouse and was tossed out from her marital home together with her children. The supreme court referred to the holy. She got married in 1932 with mohammad ahmed khan, then in 1970's ahmed khan decided to bring a second wife. Shah bano begum & others case and the subsequent legislation passed by the rajiv gandhi government in 1986 is often remembered as a pivotal moment in india's political history.

It laid the ground for thousands of women to make legitimate claims which they were not allowed before.

They were married for 14 years and had 5 children when ahmed khan married a younger woman. Shah bano begum and others, supreme court criminal appeal no. Shah bano begum 1985 (1) scale 767 = 1985 (3) scr 844 = 1985 (2) scc 556 = air 1985 sc 945, commonly referred to as the shah bano case, was a controversial. ((cj) misra rangnath desai, d.a. Ahmed khan respondents shah bano begum and ors date of judgement 23 rd april, 1985 bench hon'ble justice chandrachud, y.v. Mohd ahmed khan (the appealing party) who was a lawyer by profession, married to shah bano begum (the respondent) in 1932, had three sons and two daughters from this marriage. Also called the shah bano case is seen as one of the milestones in muslim women's fight for rights in india and the battle against the set muslim personal law. This is a landmark judgement in securing the rights of muslim women on the maintenance field. A provision was applied in terms of uniform civil code. Ahmed khan vs shah bano begum and ors. F 1986 sc 587 (4) rf 1987 sc1103 (10) d 1988. The appellant, who was an advocate by profession, was married to the respondent in 1932. This case addressed a conflict between india's civil laws and its muslim personal status laws (called muslim personal laws), triggered by a specific provision related to maintenance after divorce.

Shah bano begum and ors. In the year 1975, shah bano begum at the age of 60 years was thrown out of the house due to constant conflict and fights between mohammed ahmed khan's 2nd wife who was 14 years younger than m.a khan. Khan took another wife, legally according to islamic law, with whom he produced additional children. The judgment was delivered by: The entire extended family shared a home, from which mr.

Landmark Judgment Of Mohd Ahmed Khan Versus Shah Bano Section 125 Crpc Is Secular In Nature Lawschoolnotes
Landmark Judgment Of Mohd Ahmed Khan Versus Shah Bano Section 125 Crpc Is Secular In Nature Lawschoolnotes from lawschoolnotes.files.wordpress.com
They produced three sons and two daughters. At that time, the supreme court ( supreme court ) of a divorced muslim woman spoke of india, shah bano, upkeep. The husband (appellant) was married to the wife (respondent) in 1932. A provision was applied in terms of uniform civil code. Mohd ahmed khan (the appealing party) who was a lawyer by profession, married to shah bano begum (the respondent) in 1932, had three sons and two daughters from this marriage. Khan under section 125 of the criminal procedure code, 1973 (cr.p.c, 1973). In 1975, when shah bano's age was 62 years, she was disowned by her spouse and was tossed out from her marital home together with her children. ((cj) misra rangnath desai, d.a.

(j), misra rangnath (j) facts.

1985 air 945 1985 scr (3) 844 1985 scc (2) 556 1985 scale (1)767. Ahmed khan respondents shah bano begum and ors date of judgement 23 rd april, 1985 bench hon'ble justice chandrachud, y.v. Shah bano begum 1985 (1) scale 767 = 1985 (3) scr 844 = 1985 (2) scc 556 = air 1985 sc 945, commonly referred to as the shah bano case, was a controversial maintenance lawsuit in india, in which the supreme court delivered a judgment favouring maintenance given to an aggrieved divorced muslim woman.then the congress government enacted a law with its most controversial. Shah bano begum 1985 (1) scale 767 = 1985 (3) scr 844 = 1985 (2) scc 556 = air 1985 sc 945, commonly referred to as the shah bano case, was a controversial. Shah bano begum & ors. ((cj) misra rangnath desai, d.a. The judgment was delivered by: 1985 (1) scale 767 (23 april 1985) Khan expelled shah bano in 1975. (1985) air 945, (1985) scr (3) 844, (1985) scc (2) 556, (1985) scale (1) 767. Mohammed ahmed khan vs shah bano. Her husband said he is obligated to pay her a lumpsum of only ₹5400, as per the islamic law. When khan threw his 62 year old wife shah bano out, she filed a petition under section 125 of the code of criminal procedure, asking to be paid a monthly maintenance of ₹500.

Posting Komentar (0)
Lebih baru Lebih lama